Monday, 4 November 2013
Chhouk Bandith (r) is being proected by deputy pm men sam an who is
a close associate of prime minister hun sen.
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
PHNOM PENH, Cambodia -- A
Cambodian court on Monday upheld the conviction of a former politician
who shot and wounded three garment workers in 2012 but has yet to serve
any time behind bars in a case that has prompted outrage from rights
groups.
Chhouk Bandith, former governor of Bavet town in southeastern Cambodia,
has been on the run for months and did not show up for Monday's ruling. A
provincial court convicted him in absentia in June for the shooting at a
factory protest that left three women seriously wounded.
The ruling by Cambodia's Appeals Court
upheld Chhouk Bandith's 18-month prison sentence for causing
"unintentional injury" — a charge that rights groups have criticized as
too lenient, arguing the politician should have faced a stiffened charge
of attempted murder.
Judge Taing Sun Lay also upheld an order that Chhouk Bandith pay his
victims 38 million riel ($9,500) in compensation, and he renewed calls
for police to track down the fugitive politician so he can serve his
sentence.
Chhouk Bandith was governor at the time of the shooting. He was demoted
after being named the prime suspect, and then fled. The women, who
suffered seriously wounds, were shot while demonstrating outside their
factory with about 1,000 others for better working conditions and benefits.
Human rights groups say the failure to arrest Bandith and the light sentence demonstrate a culture of impunity for Cambodia's political elite.
"The sentence is way too lenient," said Ou Virak, president of the Cambodian Center
for Human Rights. "I think it is still a case of impunity. Chhouk
Bandith is still not appearing in court, is still not in detention, and
there is still no serious attempt to make an arrest."
The lower court's conviction followed more than a year of stalling and attempts to clear the politician's name.
A prosecutor in December 2012 dropped the charges against Bandith,
saying there was no evidence to prove he was the gunman. The move
sparked outrage among rights groups and in March was overturned on
appeal, paving the way for the June trial.
No comments:
Post a Comment